<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370</id><updated>2009-11-10T00:14:59.130-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Record Jacket Historian</title><subtitle type='html'>&lt;img src="http://fireroad.outqwest.net/images/TRJH-Logo.png" width="191" height="105" align=center&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

The Record Jacket Historian is about Music, copyright and technology&lt;br&gt;
Logo &amp;copy; David Fedoruk December 2005</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>35</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-1576512147782464674</id><published>2006-11-04T10:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-11-04T10:38:13.851-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Blogger support and post signing</title><summary type='text'>If you haven't noticed, my posts are signed by "snapped synapses". This is a problem when you have multiple blogs with bogger, they are all signed by the same entity. I find this unacceptable. The folks at google help desk seem somewhat blasee about the whole affiar. The two blogs are on different subjects entiredly and were meant to be used for different purposes.I have been looking at other </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/1576512147782464674/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=1576512147782464674' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/1576512147782464674'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/1576512147782464674'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/11/blogger-support-and-post-signing.html' title='Blogger support and post signing'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-5637571301953416110</id><published>2006-09-14T12:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-09-14T12:55:27.390-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='chopin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Debussy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='classical pianists'/><title type='text'>One of the last of a generation of pianists</title><summary type='text'>I was writing an entry for another  blog post when I needed a biographical link for Ivan Moravec. Instead of the article I expected, I found that it had been toasted, pulled down by someone who obviously (and admitted it) knew nothing of Ivan Moravec. I thought it was a rather hasty and rash on his part seeing as he admitted that he didn't know who he was. It was obviousy written by a fan!But, I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/5637571301953416110/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=5637571301953416110' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/5637571301953416110'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/5637571301953416110'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/09/one-of-last-of-generation-of-pianists.html' title='One of the last of a generation of pianists'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-115629344420040433</id><published>2006-08-22T17:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-09-04T17:28:00.480-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Digital Prestidigitaion</title><summary type='text'>It happened accidentally, but I had considered it for a while. I have found that certain issues cloud what The Record Jacket Historian was meant to be. I considered transferring some things to a new blog and just talking about recorded music I've listened to or ma currently interested in.I was looking through Google's new acquisition, "Writely"   and wandered into eBlogger Beta. I attempted to </summary><link rel='related' href='http://digitalprestidigitation.blogspot.com/index.html' title='Digital Prestidigitaion'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/115629344420040433/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=115629344420040433' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/115629344420040433'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/115629344420040433'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/08/digital-prestidigitaion.html' title='Digital Prestidigitaion'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-115353538980518531</id><published>2006-07-21T19:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-08-03T22:46:17.200-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bookmarks for Music Junkies</title><summary type='text'>Have you ever been searching for something and the search engines just never quite manage to find what you're looking for? Sometimes someone else's set of prize bookmarks can help. Check out  Music-Collections .... You'll find everything from bluegrass to ethnomusicology!That is a page I will be visting often to find new reading material about music. It is so easy to get stuck in a rut and simply</summary><link rel='related' href='http://musics-collections.blogspot.com/' title='Bookmarks for Music Junkies'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/115353538980518531/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=115353538980518531' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/115353538980518531'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/115353538980518531'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/07/bookmarks-for-music-junkies.html' title='Bookmarks for Music Junkies'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114670013682977509</id><published>2006-05-03T16:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-07-21T19:20:43.933-07:00</updated><title type='text'>How Much is a Single Track Worth?</title><summary type='text'>I see by The Recording Industry vs. the People blog that some of the defendants are asking the RIAA to justify the request for damages in the amount of $750.00 per track the defendants are alleged to have downloaded. I knew that the Recording Industry was wanting and increase in what iTunes charged for downloaded music but REALLY this is ridiculous! If you think I'm jesting, you're only partially</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114670013682977509/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114670013682977509' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114670013682977509'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114670013682977509'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/05/how-much-is-single-track-worth.html' title='How Much is a Single Track Worth?'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114633705183359319</id><published>2006-04-29T11:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-07-20T09:42:08.233-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Do not adjust your set! Philips is controlling your media center, You have entered The Twilight Zone</title><summary type='text'>This headline, "Phillips attempts to Patent Advertisment Enforcement" at CDR Zone alerted me to this story. It immediately invoked a feeling of shock, horror and deja vu!Remember the Twilight Zone? Not the new ones, the old ones in black and white. The first series was a stunning success and even in black &amp; White audiences were riveted! The voice at the beginning saying "Do not adjust your set, </summary><link rel='related' href='http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PG01&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=%2220060070095%22.PGN' title='Do not adjust your set! Philips is controlling your media center, You have entered The Twilight Zone'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114633705183359319/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114633705183359319' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114633705183359319'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114633705183359319'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/04/do-not-adjust-your-set-philips-is.html' title='Do not adjust your set! Philips is controlling your media center, You have entered The Twilight Zone'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114563536092611780</id><published>2006-04-21T08:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-05-03T16:49:14.203-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Cat is Out of the Bag: SCO Spills the beans</title><summary type='text'>The cat is out of the bag! SCO has finaly spilled the beans on what its now three year long litigation against IBM is all about! They even have a real Unix expert in Max Rockind.The danger in becoming a recognized expert in one area of study is that one (of necessity) neglects other areas. Perhaps Mr. Rochkind should have done more interdisciplanary studies instead of concentrating so heavily in </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060420142847836' title='The Cat is Out of the Bag: SCO Spills the beans'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114563536092611780/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114563536092611780' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114563536092611780'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114563536092611780'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/04/cat-is-out-of-bag-sco-spills-beans.html' title='The Cat is Out of the Bag: SCO Spills the beans'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114518095363848455</id><published>2006-04-16T02:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-17T09:32:01.276-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Both the French and Yahoo get it wrong!</title><summary type='text'>Talk about biting the hand that feeds you; me thinks France is an expert at it! France's trade Minister Christine Lagarde is quoted by Yahoo as saying:"Any time a company restricts competition in a market, it gets the attentioof regulating agencies. We have to play by the rules of the game," she said." Apple? Restricting competition? I think the  French have forgotten who created that market. If </summary><link rel='related' href='http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060414-6604.html' title='Both the French and Yahoo get it wrong!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114518095363848455/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114518095363848455' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114518095363848455'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114518095363848455'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/04/both-french-and-yahoo-get-it-wrong.html' title='Both the French and Yahoo get it wrong!'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114500702034056801</id><published>2006-04-14T01:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-18T15:30:29.273-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Feisty Independent Canadian Recording Lables Speak Up!</title><summary type='text'>Following in the footsteps of Nettwerk Records, major Canadian Independent recording lables have broken with the CRIA. This news rocked the Canadian Recording Industry today with reports on Howard Knopf's blog Excessive Copyright article "CRIA - What Lies Ahead?" and  and Michael Geist in  "Removing the C from CRIA" and the CBC,'s Arts &amp; Entertainment article "Indie labels break with CRIA".</summary><link rel='related' href='http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2006/04/cria-what-lies-ahead.html' title='Feisty Independent Canadian Recording Lables Speak Up!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114500702034056801/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114500702034056801' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114500702034056801'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114500702034056801'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/04/feisty-independent-canadian-recording.html' title='Feisty Independent Canadian Recording Lables Speak Up!'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114478708571466911</id><published>2006-04-11T13:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-04-11T13:24:45.720-07:00</updated><title type='text'>I Hate DRM: The Revolt of the Masses</title><summary type='text'>Please note: This has been reposted, and moderation turned back on due to spam!For a while now there has been rumblings of dissatisfaction with Digital Restrictions (officially its Rights) Management. The loudest objections seem to have come from the open source community, but that may be only becuase I am listeing closet there.  However, this site, I Hate DRM finaly puts a point on it for the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.ihatedrm.com/cs2/' title='I Hate DRM: The Revolt of the Masses'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114478708571466911/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114478708571466911' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114478708571466911'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114478708571466911'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/04/i-hate-drm-revolt-of-masses_11.html' title='I Hate DRM: The Revolt of the Masses'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114396862517267766</id><published>2006-04-02T01:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-04-02T01:03:45.230-08:00</updated><title type='text'>INDUSTRIAL::MUSIC::LIBRARY</title><summary type='text'>INDUSTRIAL::MUSIC::LIBRARYThere is a West Coast Canadian Connection with this music, one which has never quite been acknowledged in more propper music circles. Almost the exact opposite of the Seattle grunge scene, in which there was really no scene at all, all the so called scene was generated by one band. This one has a small core of muscians and no "scene" in its own city or country, but fame </summary><link rel='related' href='http://undergroundmusiclibrary.blogspot.com/index.html' title='INDUSTRIAL::MUSIC::LIBRARY'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114396862517267766/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114396862517267766' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114396862517267766'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114396862517267766'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/04/industrialmusiclibrary.html' title='INDUSTRIAL::MUSIC::LIBRARY'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114356996724722280</id><published>2006-03-28T09:56:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-30T18:41:52.563-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Digital only release only?</title><summary type='text'>This interesting note I found on the Digital Music Web Log. It seems RadioHead is contemplating "Digital Only " releases. From what I gather hat means no packaging, cover art, liner notes at  all. This is the kind of music business B.S. that drives  me  nearly over the edge into  insanity.  Cover art has been a mainstay of the industry for years.  For bands, it means visibility and recognition. I</summary><link rel='related' href='http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006http://www.blogger.com/img/gl.link.gif/03/23/radiohead-eyeing-exclusive-digital-strategy/' title='Digital only release only?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114356996724722280/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114356996724722280' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114356996724722280'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114356996724722280'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/03/digital-only-release-only.html' title='Digital only release only?'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114332712961274013</id><published>2006-03-25T14:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-25T15:56:11.100-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Music Industry Facts FUD and Fiction</title><summary type='text'>Over the next while I will be going systematically through what we call the "Music business" and decoding all the fictions, falsehoods and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) used in the industry to confuse and burr the lines where ever convenient. This is an easy project to start but a daunting one to complete because this has happened at almost every level. Nowhere is this absent.Don't anyone </summary><link rel='related' href='http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/03/john-doe-48-replies-to-riaa-in-motown.html' title='Music Industry Facts FUD and Fiction'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114332712961274013/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114332712961274013' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114332712961274013'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114332712961274013'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/03/music-industry-facts-fud-and-fiction.html' title='Music Industry Facts FUD and Fiction'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114302161298164902</id><published>2006-03-22T01:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-22T22:15:35.126-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Perfect Digital Copies?</title><summary type='text'>It is not the first time I have commented on this case because of the glaring technical falsehoods perpetrated by the RIAA, things that they proclaim as fact which can be shown not to be so. This is yet another one. In their affidavit "Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law In Opposition to Motion" they write about "perfect digital copies". I submit that the files in question in this case are not as they </summary><link rel='related' href='http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/03/riaa-opposes-defendants-motion-to.html' title='Perfect Digital Copies?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114302161298164902/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114302161298164902' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114302161298164902'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114302161298164902'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/03/perfect-digital-copies.html' title='Perfect Digital Copies?'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114233442303398512</id><published>2006-03-13T20:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-15T17:03:10.713-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Schubert's Last Piano Sonata; Sviatoslav Richter's Unique View</title><summary type='text'>There are some pieces of music which I seem never to be finished with. The Schubert Sonata in B flat Deutsche 960 is one of them. I happened upon one of my many recordings of this work last week sometime and it set off a round of who plays what which way.It is Sviatoslav Richter's playing in this case stands out. He may be the greatest Schubert interperter of all time. That isn't to say that </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114233442303398512/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114233442303398512' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114233442303398512'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114233442303398512'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/03/schuberts-last-piano-sonata-sviatoslav.html' title='Schubert&apos;s Last Piano Sonata; Sviatoslav Richter&apos;s Unique View'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114180116540892552</id><published>2006-03-07T22:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-14T03:07:52.776-08:00</updated><title type='text'>If Online Sales Aren't good, obviously its because of Piracy ... NOT</title><summary type='text'>I was alerted to this article which appeared in the Vancouver Sun recently, at Canada.com by reading Michael Geist's most excelent Blog. This Blog stands with Pamela Jones Groklaw as probably the best Blogs in the blogosphere.Aparently Canadians are not buying enough music online,  therefore we must be stealling it! or so says Graham Henderson of the Canadian Recording Industry Assosciation.So </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/business/story.html?id=1c1321d4-3ed4-43e5-bb99-b81cbac4f16d' title='If Online Sales Aren&apos;t good, obviously its because of Piracy ... NOT'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114180116540892552/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114180116540892552' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114180116540892552'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114180116540892552'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/03/if-online-sales-arent-good-obviously.html' title='If Online Sales Aren&apos;t good, obviously its because of Piracy ... NOT'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114164764802675895</id><published>2006-03-06T04:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-11T01:27:34.110-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The RIAA Throws In The Towel: A Chink In The Armour?</title><summary type='text'>Chink in the armour indeed! But is this only wishful thinking? its possible, however, I hope for the best.For a long time I have known that there is an underlying problem in the upper echalons of the businesss world. It is that they are completely disconnected with the advances in technology. They are not technophobes by any means. Their power and positions have enabled them to simply bypass it. </summary><link rel='related' href='http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/03/mystery-riaa-discontinues-against-john.html' title='The RIAA Throws In The Towel: A Chink In The Armour?'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114164764802675895/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114164764802675895' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114164764802675895'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114164764802675895'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/03/riaa-throws-in-towel-chink-in-armour.html' title='The RIAA Throws In The Towel: A Chink In The Armour?'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114111851405594242</id><published>2006-02-28T01:14:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-05-05T14:47:22.306-07:00</updated><title type='text'>You catch More Flies With Honey!</title><summary type='text'>Recenetly, Sterophile Magazine reported this:  Lay off the DRM!February 26, 2006 — Speaking at the Music 2.0 conference in Los Angeles on February 23, Yahoo Music's general manager Dave Goldberg startled listeners with a statement probably never previously heard from the head of a for-pay digital music service:"DRM is not a consumer value proposition, it’s a consumer cost," said Goldberg. "It </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.stereophile.com/news/022606yahoo/' title='You catch More Flies With Honey!'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114111851405594242/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114111851405594242' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114111851405594242'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114111851405594242'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/02/you-catch-more-flies-with-honey.html' title='You catch More Flies With Honey!'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114019282241404052</id><published>2006-02-17T07:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-18T00:22:44.033-08:00</updated><title type='text'>I'm confused: What exactly do you mean by label?</title><summary type='text'>Preface:These stoies are ones I lived through, I am documentiing it now from memory. They are also a view from the bottom rung of the industry in a medium sized, very wet city on the Pacific coast of North America. So some of these time lines may not be exactly right but they are as nearly as I can remember them. If you have information or more detail about any of these facts, please let me know.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114019282241404052/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114019282241404052' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114019282241404052'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114019282241404052'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/02/im-confused-what-exactly-do-you-mean.html' title='I&apos;m confused: What exactly do you mean by label?'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-114015675717522648</id><published>2006-02-16T21:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-18T00:23:15.050-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Black Ages: The Errosion of Public Domain</title><summary type='text'>I had not intended to address this issue until later, however things have progressed to the point where I believe it necessary that everyone's voice must be heard. Further that everyone who is capable should be shouting in descent.Why is this coming now? Google Videos are now available. Most of the content is now public domain, but if you get it from Google, you will be subject to their terms of </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.boingboing.net/2006/02/14/google_video_drm_why.html' title='The Black Ages: The Errosion of Public Domain'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/114015675717522648/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=114015675717522648' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114015675717522648'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/114015675717522648'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/02/black-ages-errosion-of-public-domain.html' title='The Black Ages: The Errosion of Public Domain'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-113729692030351055</id><published>2006-01-14T19:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-31T09:56:21.123-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Passing of a Legend; Birgit Nillson Dies at 87</title><summary type='text'>I am saddened to note, one of my Favourite Wagnerian Sopranos, Birgit Nillson died on December 25, 2005. The BBC  noted her passing on Thursday, adding that there had been no illness reported and the the funeral had taken place (the previous day)  Wednesday in her home town,Vastra Karup, southern Sweden.Nilsson made her stage debut in 1946 at the Stockholm Royal Opera. Her Metropolitan Opera </summary><link rel='related' href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4602928.stm' title='The Passing of a Legend; Birgit Nillson Dies at 87'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/113729692030351055/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=113729692030351055' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113729692030351055'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113729692030351055'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/01/passing-of-legend-birgit-nillson-dies.html' title='The Passing of a Legend; Birgit Nillson Dies at 87'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-113666479951507555</id><published>2006-01-07T12:08:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-07T13:38:47.663-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Canadians Sue Sony</title><summary type='text'>Canadian blogster and Proffessor of Law in Ottawa, Michael Geist writes that there are two new Canadian Lawsuits in the Sony rootkit Scandle first reported on  Mark Russinovich's blog on October 31, 2005. This one's just not going away for Sony. If you're worried that you might have this root kit or any other Windows root kit, SysInternals has created a  RootKitRevealer. This is well worth </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1062&amp;Itemid=89&amp;nsub=' title='Canadians Sue Sony'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/113666479951507555/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=113666479951507555' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113666479951507555'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113666479951507555'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/01/canadians-sue-sony.html' title='Canadians Sue Sony'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-113649433543944822</id><published>2006-01-05T12:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-08T13:37:56.803-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Michael Geist's copyright pledge for Canadian Politicians</title><summary type='text'>The front page of  Michael Geist's web page makes for some interesting reading. It seems that our friends from south of the boarder in Holly wood South having been contributing campaign funds to certain Canadian politicians. I wonder if this has anything to do with the upcoming review of Canada's copyright laws?He is asking all politicians in this election to take the following pledge:No Member </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.michaelgeist.ca/' title='Michael Geist&apos;s copyright pledge for Canadian Politicians'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/113649433543944822/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=113649433543944822' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113649433543944822'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113649433543944822'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/01/michael-geists-copyright-pledge-for.html' title='Michael Geist&apos;s copyright pledge for Canadian Politicians'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-113617186409253104</id><published>2006-01-01T18:55:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-07-27T17:57:57.023-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Recording Industry Deja Vu</title><summary type='text'>A few weeks ago Steve Jobs made this comment to the press (I'll quote from one of my favourite sites, Ars Technica Ken "Ceasar" Fisher's blog at ars technica Jobs calls music industry greedyIf they want to raise the prices, it means that they are getting greedy," said Apple's CEO, Steve Jobs. "If the price goes up, they (consumers) will go back to piracy and everybody loses." He added, "Theft is </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/113617186409253104/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=113617186409253104' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113617186409253104'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113617186409253104'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2006/01/recording-industry-deja-vu.html' title='Recording Industry Deja Vu'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19326370.post-113605948093582298</id><published>2005-12-31T11:53:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-01-01T13:00:49.426-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Richard Strauss, Sir John Barbirolli, "Metamorphisis"</title><summary type='text'>On my way to make coffee I stopped to find some music to listen to while drinking my usual morning cup of coffee. Not sure of what I wanted to hear, i flipped through some stray CD's I hadn't listened to in a long while. This one popped out. Sir John Barbirolli conducting the New Philharmonia Orchestra on a double CD from EMI. Two works, the Richard Strauss Metemorphosis for 23 solo Strings and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/feeds/113605948093582298/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19326370&amp;postID=113605948093582298' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113605948093582298'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19326370/posts/default/113605948093582298'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://recordjackethistorian.blogspot.com/2005/12/richard-strauss-sir-john-barbirolli.html' title='Richard Strauss, Sir John Barbirolli, &quot;Metamorphisis&quot;'/><author><name>recordjackethistorian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06431571179485586897</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10295135985678581228'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry></feed>